Rosetta Stone?

Radio-controlled aircraft carrying explosive payloads to target -- in the 1940's!!

Think about that for a second.
Think about how much technology has changed since 1940.
Or since 1980.
Re-read those reports of recent US drone attacks.
Drones: un-manned, remote-controlled flying bombs.

Now consider that around half dozen of the alleged "19 Arab hijackers" have since turned up alive and well, proving that we don't know WHO in hell was on those 911 aircraft. Consider all the "evidence" that stinks of being planted, like the hijacker's ID that we're supposed to believe miraculously survived the crash unscathed to be found on the street nearby. Ask yourself how the hijackers were able to gain entry to the cockpit on ALL four planes, anyway.

Now consider this possibility:
19 Arabs did NOT hijack the planes and fly them into the WTC.
NO ONE flew them into the WTC.
No one ON BOARD, that is.
Suppose, just as an alternative theory of the crime, that person-or-persons-unknown took remote control of those aircraft.
Is it plausible?
Does it fit the evidence?

Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.

Arthur Conan Doyle

sj